I frequent a website called FreeMusicArchive.org. It’s all
free and legal; the artists post their songs under a creative commons license for
people to download. Some biggish names are there (Son Volt, Deadstring
Brothers, Rodrigo y Gabriela)—mostly live tracks recorded at the radio stations
that support FMA—but many are unknowns. Tens of thousands of songs, yours
within seconds over the internet. We’ve come a long way from holding a tape
recorder to the radio, haven’t we?
Anyway, I’d like you all to humor me in a fun exercise. Go
to FreeMusicArchive.org. On the right-hand side is a box labeled “Recently
Added Highlights.” Next to each track is a plus sign that adds the song to
an online music player (you might have to unblock popups). Don’t play directly
on the page; I’m going somewhere with this. Add the first five tracks to the
FMA player. Hit “pause” before the first track plays (going somewhere with this
. . .). Just below that box is another labeled “Most Interesting Highlights.”
Add the first five of these tracks. Next, go to the “Browse by Genre” area, and
select three genres of your choice. Add one track from each of the first five
artists in each genre. You should now have twenty-five tracks in your player.
Ready for the excitement? Hit “Play.”
What do you think of the first track? Great from the start?
Horrible? Need to hear more before you decide? If you’re not sure, click the
selector to the middle and see if it takes off later. If you’re convinced the
song tanks (trust me, you have to kiss a lot of toads on FMA), click “Next.”
But if you like it, click “Download.”
[Do not proceed reading until you reach the end of the track
list]
So what did you think? Some of the songs were just noise,
weren’t they? Worthless and you hit “next” within a few seconds. I’ll bet other
tracks had great music, but the singer had a lousy voice. Some tracks probably
did most things right, but some critical elements were missing somehow. Or
maybe there was nothing wrong with the song at all, it just wasn’t your cup of
tea. But then there were the masterpieces, the tracks that started strong and
stayed strong. The keepers. How many keepers did you find?
Feel confident in your choices? Well, guess what: you have
just done what agents and editors do with stories.
Pretend the tracks are submissions. Some weren’t in your
genre, and are similar to submissions that don’t fit the guidelines; they were
sent to anyone with an address. Doesn’t mean they weren’t good, just not what
you were looking for. Selecting three genres was like posting your guidelines
in an effort to up your chances of finding something you’ll like. Even so, the
quality varied from incoherent ramblings of people with marginal (I’m being
generous here) talent, through people who did most things right but it just wasn't quite "there," to the perfectly fine pieces you simply didn’t like,
to the keepers you will listen to five times in the next few hours.
Free downloads are one thing, now imagine being responsible
for your magazine’s or publishing house’s financial investments in stories and
books. As much as rejections sting sometimes, I think I have some idea of what
agents and editors go through.
I think a lot of people forget that book/magazine production is a business, and the ultimate purpose of a business is to make money. Yes, there may be other motivations besides just money making (love of art, betterment of humanity,), but if the business doesn't make money, those things aren't going to happen.
ReplyDeleteMaking the jump from "writing as fun" and "writing for publication" was both easy and difficult at the same time. It was difficult in that I couldn't just "follow my heart," I have to pay more attention to what other peoples' hearts tell them to read. It was easy because it can be a lot of fun too.
DeleteHi there! Please visit the website for Music Archives and other Music Instruments Review.
ReplyDeletehttps://musicadvisor.com/top-10-high-quality-free-music-archivesfree-music-archive/ Enjoy!