And sadly, no, it’s not one of those sweeping epics that
keeps on going because I love it so much and want the characters to experience
more. It’s a short story. It has a beginning where the characters define
themselves by their actions. It has a middle where the central issue/conflict/trouble
is revealed and builds in intensity. It should have an end. It deserves to have
an end; it’s a good story. It has the beginning of an end, and the middle of an
end. It needs to have the end of an end.
It also has all the means to an end. All the characters are on
the page and moving. One of the characters is a drunken madman. The other
character is his wife. A third character is sleeping in another room. A potential
murder weapon is sitting on the table. An open door leads away to safety. The
reveal has, more or less, been revealed, but neither of the characters knows
what to do about it. The wife has no reason to use the murder weapon. The
drunken madman has a reason, but no sparking incident to make him want to use
it. And the third, well, the third is a toddler and sleeping; she’s no help.
Is this failure a failure of the story, a failure of the
author, or a failure of . . . well, I like things in threes but the inability
to come up with a third is certainly the failure of the blogger.
Perhaps any failure of a story can be attributed to the
author for getting himself and his characters into this mess in the first
place. Did I plan a story that has no outcome? Is it a case where the reveal is
what it is, and there’s really nothing that can be said about it after it
happens? A failure in planning and plotting, that is. In such cases, the story
is sometimes too linear: “Bob drives to the store. Bob arrives at the store.
The end.” Or if not too linear, perhaps all the divergent threads have nothing
to talk about once they get together at the end, like meeting a college friend
after years apart, only to find our lives are either too different or too
similar to have any basis for conversation. You sit for an hour over coffee
exchanging three-word sentences only to end promising to do it again next time
you’re both in town. But you know you won’t.
All of that is much easier and more diverting than addressing
what is likely the real problem: my inability to visualize how real people
would react in the situation I’ve put them in. What would I do if I were the
drunken madman? Any memories of being a drunken madman are quite fuzzy; I can
only go by what the police reports say (and the ex-girlfriends still won’t talk
to me, so they’re no help). What would I do if I were the wife witnessing a
reveal that would surely shock her? She’s in no immediate danger unless drunken
madman decides using the murder weapon would be a good idea; she has no reason
to leave. A spark that makes him use it would force her to react. Any path that
diverges into this woods is equally unsatisfying, and taking the one less
traveled will not make the difference. Robert Frost was obviously not a writer
(kidding!).